Harvard legal scholar Martha Minow called for artificial intelligence that supports independent thought in her Compton Lecture at MIT on 22 October. The university’s 23 October report raises a design question for Hungarian schools and families too: does an application help the learner, or do the work for them?
According to the MIT report, Minow sees potential in tools offering questions and guidance. This is an expert proposal, rather than an experiment establishing the effectiveness of a particular educational product.
Three comparable tasks could frame our suggested editorial test. First, the student explains a solution without help. Next, they ask the application for one hint. Finally, they solve a similar task independently again. Assessment should consider the explanation and transfer to a new situation alongside the correct answer. We present this as an idea for investigation, not a completed measurement or a proven teaching method.
Our AI quality-management standard article concerns organisational processes, while the digital rulebook report covers the regulatory background. Neither replaces direct assessment of learning. Next, watch for public, comparable evaluations that measure knowledge after assistance is removed. Hungarian-language tasks would need separate testing: an English example cannot establish the outcome of domestic use.
Original editorial content. Read our editorial standards.
Budapest Global Review: Minow calls for AI that supports independent thought at MIT. Budapest Global Review, 22 October 2026. https://globalreview.hu/en/cikk/mit-minow-mi-oktatas-kritikai-gondolkodas-2026